{"id":6487,"date":"2026-07-30T21:28:23","date_gmt":"2026-07-30T21:28:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/?p=6487"},"modified":"2026-07-30T21:28:32","modified_gmt":"2026-07-30T21:28:32","slug":"financial-morality-of-poles-2026-debt-is-a-duty-but-exceptions-are-growing-71370","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/financial-morality-of-poles-2026-debt-is-a-duty-but-exceptions-are-growing-71370\/","title":{"rendered":"Financial Morality of Poles 2026: Debt Is a Duty, but Exceptions Are Growing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nearly nine in ten Poles believe that repaying debt is an absolute moral obligation. However, attitudes become far more permissive when respondents assess specific situations. Undeclared work intended to avoid wage garnishment is justified by 58% of respondents, while almost half accept frequent bank account switching to evade a bailiff. The greatest tolerance for such behaviour is found among young people and households struggling to repay loans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"ep-wrap\">\n<style>\n.ep-wrap{--ep-red:#dd1313;--ep-dark:#161616;--ep-bg:#f7f7f7;font-family:Georgia,'Times New Roman',serif;color:#1a1a1a;line-height:1.65;max-width:900px;margin:0 auto;}\n.ep-wrap p,.ep-wrap td,.ep-wrap th,.ep-wrap .ep-kpi-label{font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,\"Segoe UI\",Roboto,Arial,sans-serif;}\n.ep-wrap h2{color:var(--ep-dark);font-size:1.7em;font-weight:700;margin:1.6em 0 0.6em;line-height:1.3;font-family:Georgia,'Times New Roman',serif;}\n.ep-wrap h2.ep-title{font-size:1.9em;margin-top:0;border-bottom:3px solid var(--ep-red);padding-bottom:0.4em;}\n.ep-wrap h3{color:var(--ep-dark);font-size:1.25em;font-weight:700;margin:1.4em 0 0.5em;font-family:Georgia,'Times New Roman',serif;}\n.ep-wrap p{margin:0 0 1.1em;font-size:1.02em;}\n.ep-lead{font-size:1.15em;color:#2b2b2b;font-weight:500;}\n.ep-kpi-grid{display:grid;grid-template-columns:repeat(4,1fr);gap:14px;margin:1.6em 0 2em;}\n.ep-kpi{background:var(--ep-dark);color:#fff;border-radius:4px;padding:16px 12px;text-align:center;border-top:3px solid var(--ep-red);}\n.ep-kpi .ep-kpi-num{display:block;font-size:1.8em;font-weight:800;color:var(--ep-red);line-height:1.1;font-family:Georgia,'Times New Roman',serif;}\n.ep-kpi .ep-kpi-label{display:block;font-size:0.8em;margin-top:6px;color:#e6e6e6;}\n.ep-chart-box{background:var(--ep-bg);border:1px solid #e2e2e2;border-radius:4px;padding:18px 18px 8px;margin:1.4em 0 1.8em;}\n.ep-chart-canvas-wrap{position:relative;height:340px;width:100%;}\n.ep-source{font-size:0.82em;color:#6a6a6a;margin-top:10px;text-align:right;}\n.ep-callout{border-left:4px solid var(--ep-red);background:#fdeeee;padding:14px 18px;border-radius:0 4px 4px 0;margin:1.4em 0;}\n.ep-callout strong{color:var(--ep-dark);}\n.ep-note{font-size:0.85em;color:#6a6a6a;font-style:italic;}\n.ep-table{width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:1em 0 1.6em;font-size:0.95em;font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont,\"Segoe UI\",Roboto,Arial,sans-serif;}\n.ep-table th{background:var(--ep-dark);color:#fff;text-align:left;padding:8px 10px;border-top:3px solid var(--ep-red);}\n.ep-table td{padding:8px 10px;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e2e2;}\n.ep-table tr:nth-child(even) td{background:var(--ep-bg);}\n@media (max-width:640px){.ep-kpi-grid{grid-template-columns:repeat(2,1fr);}}\n<\/style>\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_85 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/financial-morality-of-poles-2026-debt-is-a-duty-but-exceptions-are-growing-71370\/#Poles_increasingly_justify_financial_misconduct_against_institutions\" >Poles increasingly justify financial misconduct against institutions<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/financial-morality-of-poles-2026-debt-is-a-duty-but-exceptions-are-growing-71370\/#Declarations_versus_specific_situations\" >Declarations versus specific situations<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/financial-morality-of-poles-2026-debt-is-a-duty-but-exceptions-are-growing-71370\/#A_hierarchy_of_tolerance_from_loan_fraud_to_undeclared_work\" >A hierarchy of tolerance: from loan fraud to undeclared work<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/financial-morality-of-poles-2026-debt-is-a-duty-but-exceptions-are-growing-71370\/#Who_justifies_misconduct_most\" >Who justifies misconduct most<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/financial-morality-of-poles-2026-debt-is-a-duty-but-exceptions-are-growing-71370\/#Why_Poles_justify_misconduct\" >Why Poles justify misconduct<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/financial-morality-of-poles-2026-debt-is-a-duty-but-exceptions-are-growing-71370\/#Not_all_debts_are_equal\" >Not all debts are equal<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/financial-morality-of-poles-2026-debt-is-a-duty-but-exceptions-are-growing-71370\/#An_index_without_a_clear_trend\" >An index without a clear trend<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2 class=\"ep-title\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Poles_increasingly_justify_financial_misconduct_against_institutions\"><\/span>Poles increasingly justify financial misconduct against institutions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p class=\"ep-lead\">Nearly 90 percent of Poles say repaying debt is an absolute moral duty, but that rigor softens once the question turns to specific situations. Taking undeclared cash-in-hand work to avoid wage garnishment by a bailiff is now justified by 58.0 percent of respondents, and frequently switching bank accounts to dodge a bailiff seizure is justified by nearly half. These are among the findings of the 11th edition of &#8220;Financial Morality of Poles 2026,&#8221; a report from the Polish Financial Companies Association (Zwi\u0105zek Przedsi\u0119biorstw Finansowych, ZPF).<\/p>\n<p>The survey was conducted by Biostat on behalf of ZPF in February and March 2026, on a nationally representative sample of 1,000 Polish adults aged 18 and over. The project has run annually since 2016, allowing the tracking of long-term shifts in public attitudes toward consumer misconduct in personal finance.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ep-kpi-grid\">\n<div class=\"ep-kpi\"><span class=\"ep-kpi-num\">42.0<\/span><span class=\"ep-kpi-label\">Index of Acceptance of Unethical Financial Behavior (IAUFB), 2026<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"ep-kpi\"><span class=\"ep-kpi-num\">88.0%<\/span><span class=\"ep-kpi-label\">say repaying debt is an absolute moral duty<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"ep-kpi\"><span class=\"ep-kpi-num\">58.0%<\/span><span class=\"ep-kpi-label\">justify undeclared work to dodge a bailiff \u2014 the highest tolerance recorded<\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"ep-kpi\"><span class=\"ep-kpi-num\">10.1%<\/span><span class=\"ep-kpi-label\">justify using someone else&#8217;s ID to obtain a loan \u2014 the lowest tolerance recorded<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Declarations_versus_specific_situations\"><\/span>Declarations versus specific situations<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Responses to the general question of whether debt repayment is always a moral duty have stayed high for eleven years running, but have been drifting down. In 2016, 97 percent of respondents agreed; by 2026 that figure was 88 percent. At the same time, the share of undecided respondents has grown from 1 percent to 8 percent. The share of people flatly denying the obligation remains small, hovering between 2 and 4 percent over the years.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ep-chart-box\">\n<div class=\"ep-chart-canvas-wrap\"><canvas id=\"epChartTrend\"><\/canvas><\/div>\n<p class=\"ep-source\">Source: Financial Morality of Poles 2026, ZPF, Gda\u0144sk 2026. Own elaboration.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Prof. Anna Lewicka-Strza\u0142ecka, the report&#8217;s author, notes that this gap between a general declaration and the assessment of specific behavior is a recurring pattern \u2014 people tend to be more demanding at the level of abstract moral principles than when judging concrete, detailed situations.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"A_hierarchy_of_tolerance_from_loan_fraud_to_undeclared_work\"><\/span>A hierarchy of tolerance: from loan fraud to undeclared work<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Respondents were asked whether nine specific consumer behaviors could be justified, ranging from the most strictly judged to the most widely tolerated. The spread is wide: from 10.1 percent tolerance for using someone else&#8217;s identity document to obtain a loan, to 58.0 percent tolerance for taking undeclared work to avoid wage garnishment.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ep-chart-box\">\n<div class=\"ep-chart-canvas-wrap\"><canvas id=\"epChartHierarchy\"><\/canvas><\/div>\n<p class=\"ep-source\">Share answering &#8220;sometimes,&#8221; &#8220;often,&#8221; or &#8220;always&#8221; can be justified. Source: ZPF, Financial Morality of Poles 2026. Own elaboration.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>The report&#8217;s authors stress that this ranking has stayed largely stable for eleven years \u2014 behaviors at the top and bottom rarely swap places, while shifts mostly occur in the middle of the list. They link this to a distinction between actively initiating a crime (using someone else&#8217;s ID) versus reacting to, or taking advantage of, an opportunity (such as not correcting a cashier&#8217;s error in one&#8217;s own favor).<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Who_justifies_misconduct_most\"><\/span>Who justifies misconduct most<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>The Index of Acceptance of Unethical Financial Behavior (IAUFB) \u2014 a composite measure of tolerance for misconduct, standing at 42.0 for the full sample \u2014 varies most by gender and age. Men report notably higher permissiveness than women, and the youngest respondents show tolerance roughly 1.6 times higher than those aged 65 and over.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ep-chart-box\">\n<div class=\"ep-chart-canvas-wrap\"><canvas id=\"epChartDemo\"><\/canvas><\/div>\n<p class=\"ep-source\">IAUFB across selected socio-demographic groups, 2026. Source: ZPF, Financial Morality of Poles 2026. Own elaboration.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>A third factor is the respondent&#8217;s relationship with financial institutions. The highest permissiveness (IAUFB of 63.3) is found among households that took out a loan and are struggling to repay it, as well as among people who feel wronged by banks, loan companies, or insurers. Respondents fully satisfied with their bank&#8217;s services show permissiveness well below average, at 35.2.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ep-note\">The report also includes a regional breakdown of the IAUFB across Poland&#8217;s voivodeships (fig. 6). Given how that figure was rendered in the original document, only the two extremes stated explicitly in the text are cited here: the highest tolerance was recorded in the Opolskie and Lubuskie voivodeships (47.7), and the lowest in Pomorskie (35.0). Other regional figures are not reproduced, to avoid imprecise attribution.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Why_Poles_justify_misconduct\"><\/span>Why Poles justify misconduct<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>The dominant argument behind justifying consumer misconduct is a belief that financial institutions \u2014 lenders, insurers, bailiffs, tax offices \u2014 are themselves not always fair. That argument dominates, for instance, among those justifying frequent bank account switching to dodge a bailiff (74.4 percent of responses) or inflating an insurance claim (69.1 percent). In two cases \u2014 undeclared work and withholding information that would block a loan \u2014 the leading justification is instead the individual&#8217;s difficult financial situation.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ep-callout\">\n<p><strong>Duty-based reasoning dominates among the strict.<\/strong> Among respondents who never justify a given behavior, all nine cases are dominated by an appeal to honesty as a value that should never be compromised \u2014 ranging from 72.7 percent of responses (not correcting a cashier&#8217;s error) to 93.3 percent (using someone else&#8217;s identity document).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Not_all_debts_are_equal\"><\/span>Not all debts are equal<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>This year&#8217;s edition also asked, for the first time, about perceptions of unpaid obligations themselves. Seven in ten respondents attribute a friend&#8217;s unpaid debt to external circumstances rather than poor payment morality \u2014 but once it becomes clear the debtor has the money and simply chooses not to pay, 71 percent switch to a negative judgment.<\/p>\n<p>Asked which types of debt are most harmful to the economy and society, respondents most often named unpaid child support and business arrears owed to other companies. Small consumer debts and unpaid loans between family members or friends were seen as least harmful.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ep-chart-box\">\n<div class=\"ep-chart-canvas-wrap\"><canvas id=\"epChartHarm\"><\/canvas><\/div>\n<p class=\"ep-source\">Share of respondents rating a given type of debt as &#8220;very harmful&#8221; to the economy and society. Source: ZPF, Financial Morality of Poles 2026. Own elaboration.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>What drives Poles to pay on time? The survey suggests fear of consequences outweighs moral conviction: the strongest motivators were avoiding legal trouble and avoiding extra costs, while the weakest was concern for one&#8217;s reputation with family or at work.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"An_index_without_a_clear_trend\"><\/span>An index without a clear trend<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Over the longer run, since 2019, the IAUFB has fluctuated between 41.0 and 46.2, without a clear upward or downward trend \u2014 the 2026 reading is slightly higher than the year before. The report&#8217;s authors read this as evidence that a broad &#8220;gray zone&#8221; of tolerance for consumer misconduct in personal finance persists, largely independent of the economic cycle or the political climate.<\/p>\n<table class=\"ep-table\">\n<tr><th>Respondent characteristic<\/th><th>IAUFB 2026<\/th><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Overall<\/td><td>42.0<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Men<\/td><td>45.6<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Women<\/td><td>38.8<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Age 18\u201329<\/td><td>54.0<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Age 65 and over<\/td><td>34.1<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Has a loan, struggling to repay<\/td><td>63.3<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Never had a loan<\/td><td>39.6<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<script src=\"https:\/\/cdnjs.cloudflare.com\/ajax\/libs\/Chart.js\/4.4.1\/chart.umd.min.js\" data-cfasync=\"false\" class=\"nowprocket\"><\/script>\n<script data-cfasync=\"false\" class=\"nowprocket\">\n(function(){\nvar epAttempts=0;\nvar epTimer=setInterval(function(){\nepAttempts++;\nif(typeof window.Chart!==\"undefined\"){\nclearInterval(epTimer);\nepDrawCharts();\n}else if(epAttempts>100){\nclearInterval(epTimer);\n}\n},100);\nfunction epDrawCharts(){\nvar dark=\"#161616\";var red=\"#dd1313\";\ntry{\nvar elTrend=document.getElementById(\"epChartTrend\");\nif(elTrend){\nnew window.Chart(elTrend.getContext(\"2d\"),{\ntype:\"line\",\ndata:{labels:[\"2016\",\"2017\",\"2018\",\"2019\",\"2020\",\"2021\",\"2022\",\"2023\",\"2024\",\"2025\",\"2026\"],\ndatasets:[{label:\"Agree debt repayment is a moral duty (%)\",data:[97,95,94,94,90,92,91,89,91,91,88],borderColor:dark,backgroundColor:dark,pointBackgroundColor:red,pointBorderColor:red,tension:0.25,fill:false,borderWidth:3}]},\noptions:{responsive:true,maintainAspectRatio:false,scales:{y:{min:80,max:100,ticks:{callback:function(v){return v+\"%\";}}}},plugins:{legend:{display:false}}}\n});\n}\n}catch(e){}\ntry{\nvar elH=document.getElementById(\"epChartHierarchy\");\nif(elH){\nnew window.Chart(elH.getContext(\"2d\"),{\ntype:\"bar\",\ndata:{labels:[\"Using someone else's ID for a loan\",\"Inflating an insurance claim\",\"Not flagging a cashier's error in own favor\",\"Withholding info that blocks a loan\",\"Switching bank accounts before a bailiff\",\"Taking a loan without reading the terms\",\"Transferring assets to dodge a creditor\",\"Cash payment to avoid VAT\",\"Undeclared work to dodge a bailiff\"],\ndatasets:[{label:\"Share who would justify it (%)\",data:[10.1,31.4,31.8,46.2,46.9,47.9,52.2,54.1,58.0],backgroundColor:red,borderRadius:4}]},\noptions:{indexAxis:\"y\",responsive:true,maintainAspectRatio:false,scales:{x:{min:0,max:70,ticks:{callback:function(v){return v+\"%\";}}}},plugins:{legend:{display:false}}}\n});\n}\n}catch(e){}\ntry{\nvar elD=document.getElementById(\"epChartDemo\");\nif(elD){\nnew window.Chart(elD.getContext(\"2d\"),{\ntype:\"bar\",\ndata:{labels:[\"Overall\",\"Men\",\"Women\",\"Age 18\u201329\",\"Age 30\u201349\",\"Age 50\u201364\",\"Age 65+\"],\ndatasets:[{label:\"IAUFB\",data:[42.0,45.6,38.8,54.0,44.7,38.4,34.1],backgroundColor:dark,borderRadius:4}]},\noptions:{responsive:true,maintainAspectRatio:false,scales:{y:{min:0,max:60}},plugins:{legend:{display:false}}}\n});\n}\n}catch(e){}\ntry{\nvar elHarm=document.getElementById(\"epChartHarm\");\nif(elHarm){\nnew window.Chart(elHarm.getContext(\"2d\"),{\ntype:\"bar\",\ndata:{labels:[\"Unpaid child support\",\"Business arrears to other firms\",\"Tax\/social security arrears\",\"Rent and utility arrears\",\"Unpaid bank loans\",\"Loans among family\/friends\",\"Small consumer debts\"],\ndatasets:[{label:\"Very harmful (%)\",data:[64.6,58.8,40.6,35.7,34.2,33.0,11.7],backgroundColor:red,borderRadius:4}]},\noptions:{indexAxis:\"y\",responsive:true,maintainAspectRatio:false,scales:{x:{min:0,max:70,ticks:{callback:function(v){return v+\"%\";}}}},plugins:{legend:{display:false}}}\n});\n}\n}catch(e){}\n}\n})();\n<\/script>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nearly nine in ten Poles believe that repaying debt is an absolute moral obligation. However, attitudes become far more permissive when respondents assess specific situations. Undeclared work intended to avoid wage garnishment is justified by 58% of respondents, while almost half accept frequent bank account switching to evade a bailiff. The greatest tolerance for such [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2450,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"Nearly 90% of Poles say that repaying debt is an absolute moral duty. In practice, however, many are willing to justify actions designed to avoid creditors and financial institutions.\n\nAccording to the \u201cFinancial Morality of Poles 2026\u201d report, 58% of respondents accept undeclared work intended to prevent wage garnishment by a bailiff. Almost half justify frequently switching bank accounts to avoid seizure, while more than half tolerate transferring assets to escape a creditor.\n\nThe highest acceptance of unethical financial behaviour is recorded among young adults and households struggling to repay loans. Distrust of banks, insurers, bailiffs and public institutions is one of the most common explanations.\n\nAt the same time, using someone else\u2019s identity to obtain a loan remains the least accepted form of misconduct.\n\nRead more about how Poles assess debt, financial responsibility and consumer misconduct.\n","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[6],"tags":[4769,2690,166,64,2732,4770],"class_list":["post-6487","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-finance","tag-anna-lewicka-strzalecka","tag-gap","tag-gdansk","tag-poland","tag-ranking","tag-zwiazek-przedsiebiorstw-finansowych"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6487","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6487"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6487\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6488,"href":"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6487\/revisions\/6488"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2450"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6487"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6487"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceo.com.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6487"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}